Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI ‘C’ BENCH, MUMBAI
ITA No. 1928/Mum/2020 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Page 1 of 2 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI ‘C’ BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar, Vice President and Ravish Sood, Judicial Member] ITA No. 1928/Mum/2020 Assessment Year: 2014-15
Indo Saudi Trading Company Ltd. …………………….. Appellant 202 Embassy Centre, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021, [PAN: AAACI7877C] Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3(2)(1) Mumbai ………………….Respondent
Appearances: Priyanka Sharma for the appellant Shreekala Pardeshi for the respondent
Date of concluding the hearing : October 06, 2021 Date of pronouncement : October 06, 2021
O R D E R Per Pramod Kumar, VP : 1. The assessee has moved petition seeking withdrawal of the appeal and the assessee has also filed Form No. 3, on the ground that the matter is settled under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.
Learned Departmental Representative does not oppose the prayer so made by the assessee.
There is no dispute that once the matter is resolved under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, the related appeal is required to be withdrawn.
ITA No. 1928/Mum/2020 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Page 2 of 2 4. In view of the above position, as also bearing in mind entirety of the case, we deem it fit and proper to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open court today on the 06th October, 2021.
Ravish Sood Pramod Kumar (Judicial Member) (Vice President) Mumbai, dated the 06th day of October, 2021 Copies to: (1) The Applicant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) DR (6) Guard File By order True Copy
Assistant Registrar/Sr.PS Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai benches, Mumbai