ALPA SANDEEP SHIKRE,MUMBAI vs. ITO-22(1)(6), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as the subsequent assessment order was favorable. The Tribunal accepted the withdrawal request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against a revision order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263. Subsequently, the consequential assessment order was passed with no additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed against a revision order is maintainable when the subsequent assessment order is favorable to the assessee and the assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
This appeal in A.Y.2016-17 preferred by the order against the revision order of the ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Thane-1 u/s.263 of the Act dated 16/03/2021 for the A.Y.2015-16.
2. At the time of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, assessee vide letter dated 19/10/2021, sent in email had requested for withdrawal of the appeal by stating as under:-
The abovementioned case is fixed for hearing before your Honours 21.10.2021. The appeal was preferred before your Honours against the order of the Hon'ble Pr CIT passed u/s 263 of the Act dated 01.03.2021. It is submitted before your Honours that the consequential assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Act has been passed on 22.09.2021 wherein no additions have been made. In light of the above it is submitted that I hereby withdraw the appeal filed before your Honours.
In view of the above, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 21/10/2021
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026