PANDIT REALTOR P.LTD,GHAZIABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-19(2), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue to the file of the CIT(A) to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to present its case and decide on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee company's appeal against an ex parte order of the CIT(A) was heard. The CIT(A) had confirmed penalty levied by the AO due to the assessee's non-appearance.
What were the issues?
Whether the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) should be sustained without providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : G : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE
ORDER
PER R.K. PANDA, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 20th January, 2018 of the CIT(A)-7, New Delhi, relating to assessment year 2014- 15.
The assessee in its various grounds of appeal has challenged the order of the CIT(A) sustaining various additions made by the AO.
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a company and filed its return of income on 06.11.2014 declaring total income at Rs.50,64,580/-. The AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act on 22nd December, 2016, determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.2,00,80,767/- wherein he made the following additions:- a) Unexplained share subscription - Rs.1,00,00,000/- b) Unexplained cash deposits - Rs.37,00,000/- c) Disallowance of ROC fee - Rs.76,491/- d) Disallowance of interest on TDS - Rs.2,836/- e) Disallowance of loss on car Verna - Rs.1,57,995/- f) Diwali Expenses - Rs.8,28,865/- g) Business promotion and telephone expenses - Rs.2,50,000/-
Subsequently, the AO initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act and, thereafter, levied penalty of Rs.46,56,630/- u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act being the minimum penalty leviable on account of addition of unexplained share subscription of Rs.1 crore and unexplained cash deposit of Rs.37 lakhs
Since none appeared before him, the ld.CIT(A), in his ex parte order, confirmed the penalty levied by the AO and dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee.
Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 2
We have heard the rival arguments made by both the sides and perused the orders of the authorities below. It is an admitted fact that due to non-appearance before the CIT(A), the ld.CIT(A) sustained the penalty levied by the AO u/s 271(1)(c). Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the CIT(A) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case and decide the issue as per fact and law. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the ld.CIT(A) and substantiate its case, failing which the ld.CIT(A) is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. We hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026