EMIRATES HABITATE P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's decision to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act and requested withdrawal of the appeal. The appeals were consequently consigned to records and treated as dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee had appealed against the orders of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee subsequently opted to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as the assessee has opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU
ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP : These appeals by the assessee for the assessment year 2012-13 are directed against the orders of learned CIT(A), New Delhi both dated 28.09.2018. 2. The learned counsel for the assessee, vide his letter dated 20.11.2020, has intimated the Tribunal that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute
2 ITA-7609&7610/Del/2018 relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (in short ‘the Act’) and requested for withdrawal of the said appeal.
Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeals are consigned to records and treated as dismissed.
However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforestated Act, the appellant (i.e., the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeals and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The respondent (i.e., the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeals are consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, are treated as dismissed.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026