DY CIT CC-7(1), MUMBAI vs. DR. D.Y. PATIL INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6/MUM/2021Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 November 2021AY 2011-124 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the issue was covered by the decisions of the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court, which allowed carry forward of deficits. Therefore, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the impugned order.

What were the facts?

The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order allowing the assessee to carry forward deficits to subsequent years. The assessee, a trust, had a deficit determined during assessment proceedings.

What were the issues?

Whether deficits, being excess of expenditure over receipts, can be carried forward and set off against income in subsequent years, despite no express provision in the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 153A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala – Ld. AR
For Respondent: Shri Rajat Mittal – Ld. Sr. DR, Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala – Ld. AR

Heard together (10 matters)

I.T.A. No. 06/Mum/2021
I.T.A. No. 07/Mum/2021
I.T.A. No. 08/Mum/2021
I.T.A. No. 09/Mum/2021
I.T.A. No. 10/Mum/2021
I.T.A. No. 05/Mum/2021
I.T.A. No. 1966/Mum/2020
I.T.A. No. 1967/Mum/2020
I.T.A. No. 1968/Mum/2020
I.T.A. No. 1980/Mum/2020

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

10.

आयकरअपील सं./ (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Dr. D. Y. Patil International Academy DCIT Cen Cir. 7(1) R. No. 676B, 6th floor, बिाम Dr. D. Y. Patil Knowledge City Charholi BK, Via Lohegaon Aaykar Bhavan / Vs. Pune-412 105 M. K. Road, Mumbai-20 स्थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./ PAN/GIR No. AAATD-9542-N (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : Revenue by : Shri Rajat Mittal – Ld. Sr. DR Assessee by : Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala – Ld. AR सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 27/10/2021 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 01/11/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench 1. Aforesaid appeals by revenue in case of two different assessee for Assessment Years (AY) 2011-12 to 2016-17 assail separate orders of first appellate authority. However, the facts as well as issues are common in all the years and it is admitted position that adjudication in any one year shall equally apply to other years also. For the purpose of adjudication, the appeal for AY 2011-12 is taken up first which arises out of common appellate order dated 16/10/2020 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-49, Mumbai [CIT(A)] in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A on 28/12/2018. The grounds read as under: 1. Whether On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. ClT(A) is justified in allowing the assessee to carry forward the deficit, being excess of expenditure over receipts, to subsequent years and the same is eligible to be set-off with the income of subsequent years by relying upon the judgment of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS), ignoring the fact that there was no express provision in the I T Act, 1961 permitting allowance of such claim.

2.

The judgment by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s. Subros Educational Society in M.P.No.941/2018 in CA No.5171/2016 on the issue of carry forward of deficit has not been accepted by the department and a Review Petition has been filed before the Hon'ble apex Court with Diary No. 20745/2020."

More judgments on Section 153A

All 18,957 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →