PUNABHAI V CHANDPARA,MUMBAI vs. ITO CIRCLE- 22 (2)(5), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1014/MUM/2020Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 November 2021AY 2012-132 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that once a matter is settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the related appeal is required to be withdrawn. The Departmental Representative did not oppose the prayer.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee subsequently filed a petition seeking withdrawal of the appeal, stating the matter was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal can be withdrawn if the underlying dispute has been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM

Hearing: 11/11/2021Pronounced: 11/11/2021

स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AFTPC3762M (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee by: None Revenue by: Shri Dharmvir (DR) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 11/11/2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 11/11/2021 आदेश / O R D E R

PER AMARJIT SINGH, JM:

1.

The assessee has moved petition seeking withdrawal of this appeal and the assessee has also filed Form 3, on the ground that the matter is settled under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.

2.

Learned Departmental Representative does not oppose the prayer so made by the assessee. 3. There is no dispute that once the matter is resolved under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, the related appeal is required to be withdrawn. 4. In view of the above position, as also bearing in mind entirely of the case, we deem it fit and proper to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.

A.Y.2012-13 5. In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open court today on the 11/11/2021

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →