RICON COMMODITIES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. P.C.I.T.,-4, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the tax dues were settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the revenue had no objection.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and completed all necessary forms and payments. The department issued a form for full and final settlement of tax arrears.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn after settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
O R D E R
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. Pr. CIT-4, Kolkata dated 01.03.2019 for A.Y. 2014-15 passed u/s. 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Shri Nirav Sheth, FCA appeared for the assessee and Shri Amal Kamat, CIT appeared on behalf of the revenue.
At the time of hearing, Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Form no. 1 and Form no. 2 before the Competent Authority and the Competent Authority had accepted it and had issued Form-3. Thereafter the assessee has Ricon Commodities Pvt. Ltd., A.Y: 2014-15 remitted the tax as per Form 3 and filed form no. 4 and the department has also issued Form-5 in respect of order for full and final settlement of tax arrears u/s. 5(2) read with section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (3 of 2020). Since the assessee has paid the due taxes, there is no point in keeping the impugned appeal pending. Apropos the discussion (supra) and since ld. CIT, DR does not have any objection in withdrawing the same, we allow the assessee to withdraw the impugned appeal.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order is pronounced in the open court on 13 September, 2022
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026