URMIL BANSAL,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 45(2), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The tribunal noted that the Senior DR had no objection to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee requested withdrawal of their appeals before the ITAT. This request was made because the assessee had opted to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to their opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU
PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU VP VP : VP These appeals by the assessee for the assessment years 2010- 11 and 2012-13 are directed against the orders of learned CIT(A), Delhi dated 31.03.2017.
The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 17.11.2020, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeals filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.
Learned Senior DR has no objection.
2 ITAs-4224 & 4226/Del/2017
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeals.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing in the presence of both the parties on 24th November, 2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026