I.T.O.,WARD-5(4), KOLKATA vs. M/S VALLEY TOWERS PVT. LTD., KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Revenue should have withdrawn the appeal but failed to do so. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as it was pending unnecessarily due to the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the assessee's order. The assessee, however, pointed out that the dispute had been resolved under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and provided a settlement certificate.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by the revenue should be dismissed when the assessee has settled the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, and the revenue has not withdrawn its appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA “B” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, HON’BLE & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, HON’BLE
Assessee by : Shri Ritesh Goel, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Amitava Bhattacharya, CIT, D/R सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 22/09/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 23/09/2022 आदेश/O R D E R
PER SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The present appeal is directed at the instance of the revenue against orders of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
In this appeal, the assessee has filed an application pointing out that dispute with the revenue has been resolved under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas, Act, 2020 and, therefore, the appeal ought to have been withdrawn by the revenue. In support of its contention, the assessee has filed copy of Certificate in Form 5, exhibiting full and final settlement of tax arrear as contemplated u/s 5(2) read with section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The ld. D/R in the absence of complete details was not able to controvert.
On due consideration of the facts and circumstances, we are of the view that ideally the revenue should have filed application for withdrawal of its appeal if the assessee has resolved the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. But the revenue failed to file such application. This appeal is pending unnecessarily. Therefore, taking cognizance of the facts brought to our notice by the assessee, we dismiss this appeal on the ground that the assessee has settled its dispute with the Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/s. Valley Towers Pvt. Ltd. 2 Department under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. However, on re-verification, if it emerges out that the facts submitted by the assessee are not correct, then the revenue will be at liberty to apply for recall of this order but such application should be filed within the time period contemplated u/s 254(2) of the Act. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed.
In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 5(2)
- Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Jaipur vs Kavita Khanwani, BeawarITA 867/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT Circle-3(1)(1), International… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1908/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1514/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle 3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1513/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1508/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026