← Back to search

AAMOD CULTURAL FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

PDF
ITA 816/AHD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 July 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-SHRI T.R SENTHIL KUMAR

For Appellant: Ms. Urjita Shah, AR
For Respondent: Shri Sher Singh, CIT. DR
Hearing: 29.07.2025Pronounced: 30.07.2025

PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:-

Delay Condoned

This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the appellate order dated 17.09.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Exemption), Ahmedabad, relating to the Assessment Year N.A.

2.

The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeals:

1.

Learned CIT (Exemption) erred in law and facts by making the order by rejecting the application filed in form 10AB for registration u/s.80G(5) of the IT act for not producing documents required by the authority. Asst. Year : N.A - 2–

2.

Due to non compliance by the side of Accountant, documents are pending to produce against the notice issued by the authority.

3.

Appellant craves to add, alter or delete any grounds either before or in the course of hearing of the appeal.

3.

The facts of the case are that the assessee is a Trust and filed Form No.10AB for registration u/s.80G(5)(iii) of the Act. The Ld. CIT(E) rejected the application for approval u/s.80G(5)(iii) of the Act, since the assessee trust remains un-complied and failed to submit substantial documentary evidences.

4.

Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(E), the Assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal.

5.

At the outset, we find that notices were issued from time to time to furnish details/documents as called for. The Ld.CIT(E) rejected the application of the assessee on the ground that the assessee-trust failed to produce substantial documents before the Ld.CIT(E). Therefore, the Ld. Counsel prayed that given an opportunity, the same would be apprised to the Ld.CIT(E). Ld. CIT(DR) argued that the assessee-trust needs to furnish requisite details/explanations and submissions before the Ld. CIT(E). Having considered the facts on record, we hold that interests of justice would be well served by remanding the matter to the Ld. CIT(E) for consideration of the application afresh and to pass an order by taking into consideration the submissions /explanations submitted by the assessee. Asst. Year : N.A - 3–

7.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

The order is pronounced in the open Court on 30.07.2025. (T.R SENTHIL KUMAR)
VICE-PRESIDENT

()
Ahmedabad; Dated 30.07.2025

MV

आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1.

अपीलाथŎ / The Appellant 2. ŮȑथŎ / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधतआयकरआयुƅ / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयुƅ(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाडŊ फाईल / Guard file.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.

AAMOD CULTURAL FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD | BharatTax