VARIAN INDIA P.LTD-INDIA BRANCH,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT (IT) RG 4(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal as withdrawn due to opting for the settlement scheme. The revenue's appeal was also dismissed as no confirmation of tax payment was filed by the revenue.
What were the facts?
The assessee and revenue filed cross-appeals against an assessment order. The assessee opted for the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020' for settlement.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be proceeded with when the assessee has opted for a settlement scheme and if the revenue's appeal can be dismissed due to lack of confirmation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J” BENCH, MUMBAI
O R D E R
PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM:
The Cross appeal is filed by the Assesse and Revenue against the Assessment order passed u/s 144C(13) r.w.s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. & 1069/Mum/2015 Varian Ind Pvt Ltd, Mumbai. - 2 -
At the time hearing, the Ld. Counsel of the assessee has submitted a letter mentioning that the assessee intend to settle the tax litigation by opting for ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ (VSVS2020) and received Form.no. 3 & 5 under VSVS Rules 2020. Contra, the Ld. DR has no objections.
We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. Since the assessee has opted for ‘Vivaad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ and received Form-3 from the income tax department. We are of the view that, no purpose will be served in keeping the appeal pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. Further in the case of Revenue appeal, the assesee has received Form-no-5 in respect of full and final settlement of Tax Arrears paid and the revenue was given opportunity to confirm the Tax payment/Report on 22-11-2021.But no such report/confirmation was filed. We considering the facts and circumstances dismiss the revenue appeal and the assessee/revenue is given liberty to move an application u/s 254(2) of the Act to recall the present order as per provisions of Law. & 1069/Mum/2015 Varian Ind Pvt Ltd, Mumbai. - 3 -
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee and the revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 24.11.2021.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026