CIVITAS SUSTAINABILITY FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn because the subsequent grant of Section 80G(5) registration resolved the original grievance.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the rejection of their Section 80G(5) registration application by the CIT(E). During the appeal, the assessee filed and obtained a fresh 80G(5) registration, rendering the original appeal infructuous.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal against the rejection of Section 80G(5) registration becomes infructuous and can be withdrawn if a fresh application for the same is subsequently granted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Smt. Annapurna Gupta
"ी संजय गग", "ाियक सद" एवं "ीमित अ"पूण" गु"ा, लेखा सद" के सम&। ] ] Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member And Smt. Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं /ITA No.1169/Ahd/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : - Civitas Sustainability The CIT (Exemption) बनाम/ Foundation Ahmedabad – 380 015 v/s. B/12, Aarti Flat, Nilakiran Flat Apptt. Nr.Pulkit School, B/h. Fatehnagar, Paldi Ahmedabad – 380 007 "थायी लेखा सं./PAN: AAHCC 9891 R (अपीलाथ)/ Appellant) (*+ यथ)/ Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 29 /07/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 30 /07/2025 आदेश/O R D E R
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(E)’] dated 27/03/2025, rejecting the application for registration section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 1169/Ahd/2025 Civitas Sustainability Foundation vs. The CIT (E)
A request letter dated 23rd July-2025 by C.A. Shailesh P.Mehta, Ld.AR of the assessee, has been placed on the file, wherein it is stated that the assessee had filed a fresh application for registration u./s.80G(5) with the CIT(E) and the said application has been granted by the CIT(E) and, hence, the present appeal of the assessee has become infructuous. Therefore, the assessee seeking permission to withdraw the captioned appeal. The Ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue did not express any objection in this regard. Accordingly, the prayer of the assessee for withdrawal is accepted.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026