BUNDY INDIA LIMITED,,VADODARA vs. THE DY. CIT., CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and filed Form No. 1. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order arising out of an assessment order. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, filing Form No. 1.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as the assessee has opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH
Before: DR. BRR KUMAR & Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR
Bundy India Limited Dy.Commissioner of Plot No. 2, GIDC, Income Tax Industrial Estate, Vs Circle-1(1), Baroda Makarpura, Vadodara-390010 (Respondent) PAN: AAACB3039M (Appellant) Assessee Represented: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Adv., Shri Jignesh Parikh & Shri Ukti Shah, Ars. Revenue Represented: Shri Sher Singh, CIT-DR Date of hearing : 29-07-2025 Date of pronouncement : 30-07-2025 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the appellate order dated 24.02.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Vadodara arising out of the assessment order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2008-09.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel submitted that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute under the new Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and filed copy of Form No. 1 dated 30-12-2024 with Acknowledgement No. 792357390301224. It is further submitted that Form No. 2 is awaited from the Competent Authority.
Taking note of the Form No. 1 filed under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby dismissed with liberty to the assessee to restore the appeal, in the event the application filed under VSV Scheme is rejected by the Competent Authority.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 144C(3)
- Radhakishan Potharajula, Karim Nagar vs ITO (Int Taxn)-2, HyderabadITA 2340/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Neha Hiranand Motwani, Nashik vs ITO International Tax, NashikITA 1570/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Atc Tires Private Limited, Mumbai vs The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 6468/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026