DY CIT CC 4 (1), MUMBAI vs. M/S ZENITH BIRLA INDIA LTD, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal acknowledged the settlement under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme. Consequently, the appeals pending before the Tribunal were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020 to settle the tax dispute. The designated authority issued Form-5, confirming the settlement.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed in light of the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘G‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
These appeals in 363/Mum/2020 for A.Y.2008-09 & 2010-11 arise out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-52,Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-52/IT-89/DCIT-CC- 4(1)/2016-17 & CIT(A)-52/IT-91/DCIT-CC-4(1)/2016-17 dated 23/10/2019 & 26/04/2016 respectively (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 22/03/2016 by the ld. Dy.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-4(1), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
We find that the ld. AR filed a letter dated 4th October 2021 2. mentioning that assessee had preferred an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the year under consideration and had obtained Form-5 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter. Ld. DR also agreed that the Form -5 has been received.
In view of this, we hereby dismiss the appeals pending before us.
In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 01/12/2021
More judgments on Section 153A
- V S A Infra Projects Private Limited… vs DCIT., Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 903/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed6 Nov 2026AY 2016-17
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kallu Cable vs. The Commissioner State Goods And Service TaxUttarakhand · 5 Nov 2026
- Prabhat Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 4 Nov 2026
- Siddharth Barai (Prop- Siddharth Design Studio) vs. The Superintendent CGST And Central Excise, Balangir RangeOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Shashibhusan Moharana vs. The Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, DhenkanalOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Paramount Tea Marketing PVT. LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 4 Nov 2026