SHRI SUNIL KAYAN,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-36, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee who has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJPL YADAV & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
O R D E R
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)-10, Kolkata vide Appeal No. 994/CIT(A)-10/C-36/2013- 14/2017-18/Kol dated 30.05.2019 for A.Y. 2013-14 passed against the assessment order u/s 147/143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by ACIT, Circle-36,Kolkata dated 27.12.2017.
Shri Biswanath Das, Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the revenue and Shri Piyush Lakhotia, AR appeared for the assessee.
At the outset, we note from the letter dated 03.08.2022 available in the file and also the submission of the Ld. AR of the assessee that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’). Since the assessee-appellant has requested to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, there is no point in keeping the Shri Sunil Kayan, A.Y: 2013-14 impugned appeal pending. Apropos the discussion (supra) and since Shri Biswanath Das, Sr. DR does not have any objection in withdrawing the same, we allow the assessee to withdraw the impugned appeal.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026