THE MAANAVATA FOUNDATION,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(E), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1797/DEL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 December 20202 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had passed an ex-parte order. In the interest of substantial justice, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act were rejected by the CIT(E). The assessee contended that the order was passed ex-parte without a proper opportunity of hearing.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) passed an ex-parte order denying registration and approval without affording a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA,Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “Friday” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA

For Appellant: Shri V. Raja Kumar, Adv
For Respondent: Shri Jagdish Singh Dahiya, Sr.D.R

O R D E R

PER AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the Assessee against consolidated order dated 17.09.2020, passed by Ld. CIT(E) Delhi, rejecting the application for registration u/s.12AA and also approval u/s.80G of the Act.

2.

Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the ld. CIT(E) has passed ex-parte order without giving proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee has filed all the necessary details through e-mail which has not been taken into cognizance. He requested that matter should be restored back to the file of the ld. CIT(E) to decide afresh as it is charitable activities could not be carried out.

2 ITAs No.1797 & 1798/DEL/2020

3. Ld. DR does not have any objection if the matter is restored back to the file of ld. CIT(E) to consider afresh.

3.

On perusal of the impugned order, it is seen that the Ld. CIT (E) has passed ex-parte order refusing to grant registration u/s.12AA and also approval u/s.80G. In the facts and circumstances as stated by the Ld. Counsel and in the interest of substantial justice, we deem fit that both the issues as raised in respective appeals should be remanded back to the file of the ld. CIT(E) to consider the applications filed for appellant for registration u/s.12A and approval u/s. 80G afresh and decide the application in accordance with law after giving due and effective opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

4.

In result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 11th December, 2020

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →