THE MAANAVATA FOUNDATION,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(E), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had passed an ex-parte order. In the interest of substantial justice, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act were rejected by the CIT(E). The assessee contended that the order was passed ex-parte without a proper opportunity of hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) passed an ex-parte order denying registration and approval without affording a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “Friday” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
O R D E R
PER AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the Assessee against consolidated order dated 17.09.2020, passed by Ld. CIT(E) Delhi, rejecting the application for registration u/s.12AA and also approval u/s.80G of the Act.
Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the ld. CIT(E) has passed ex-parte order without giving proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee has filed all the necessary details through e-mail which has not been taken into cognizance. He requested that matter should be restored back to the file of the ld. CIT(E) to decide afresh as it is charitable activities could not be carried out.
2 ITAs No.1797 & 1798/DEL/2020
3. Ld. DR does not have any objection if the matter is restored back to the file of ld. CIT(E) to consider afresh.
On perusal of the impugned order, it is seen that the Ld. CIT (E) has passed ex-parte order refusing to grant registration u/s.12AA and also approval u/s.80G. In the facts and circumstances as stated by the Ld. Counsel and in the interest of substantial justice, we deem fit that both the issues as raised in respective appeals should be remanded back to the file of the ld. CIT(E) to consider the applications filed for appellant for registration u/s.12A and approval u/s. 80G afresh and decide the application in accordance with law after giving due and effective opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 11th December, 2020
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026