DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -11(2)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S.SPH AGRO FARM & ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED., MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had obtained Form-3 under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme and paid the determined tax. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was treated as dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2009-10. The assessee had applied for settlement of this tax dispute under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal by the Revenue is maintainable when the assessee has settled the dispute under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘G‘ BENCH
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
This appeal in A.Y.2009-10arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-18, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-18/IT-44/DC-11(2)(2)(2)/16-17 dated 15/06/2017 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 31/03/2016 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax- 11(2)(2), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
M/s. SPH Agro Farm & Estates Pvt. Ltd.,
We find that assessee had preferred an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the year under consideration and had obtained Form-3 from the PCIT, Mumbai on 28/01/2021 and the Tax determined thereon amounting to Rs.75,71,272/- has been paid by the assessee on 28/10/2021. Since, the issue is completely settled under the “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020 by due payment of tax thereon, the appeal of the Revenue is hereby treated as dismissed.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 06/12/2021 by way of proper mentioning in the notice board.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026