Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH.
Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Pankaj Kumar ,Sr.AR-CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 09/12/2021 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 09/12/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश/ ORDER PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-8 Mumbai [ in short ‘the CIT(A)’] dated 17/04/2018 for the Assessment Year 2010-11.
(A.Y.2010-11) 2. A perusal of the appeal file shows that this appeal was filed in July 2018. The appeal was listed for hearing for the first time on 04/09/2019. The notice was issued to the assessee/appellant through RPAD on the address mentioned in Form-36. Thereafter, repeated notices were sent to the assessee through RPAD on the address furnished by the assessee. Despite repeated notices none appeared to represent the assessee nor any letter seeking adjournment on any of the dates of hearing was ever received. It seems that the assessee is not keen to prosecute the appeal, hence, this appeal is taken up for hearing with the assistance of ld. Departmental Representative and the material available on record.
Shri Pankaj Kumar representing the Department vehemently defended the impugned order and prayed for dismissing the appeal.
We have heard the submissions made by ld. Departmental Representative and have examined the orders of authorities below. In the absence of any material controverting the findings of First Appellate Authority, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Hence, the impugned order is upheld and appeal by the assessee is dismissed.
In the result, appeal by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on Thursday the 9th day of December, 2021.