PATANI YUVA SAMAJ SEWA TRUST,BANASKANTHA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 168/AHD/2025Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 August 2025Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)3 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the object of constructing community halls for various social/community functions, even with mentions of religious activities, is general and does not propagate any religion. Therefore, the CIT(E)'s finding was incorrect, and the denial of approval was unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s order and remanded the matter for a fresh decision, with a direction to grant approval if the trust is otherwise eligible.

What were the facts?

The assessee-trust's application for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act was rejected by the CIT(E). The rejection was based on the CIT(E)'s view that one of the trust's objects, involving community halls for functions including religious and national festivals, was religious in nature.

What were the issues?

The key legal issue was whether a trust's objective to maintain community halls for various social/community functions, including religious and national festivals, disqualifies it from obtaining approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Thakkar, AR
Hearing: 18/08/2025Pronounced: 19/08/2025

"ी संजय गग", "ाियक सद" एवं "ी मकरंद वसंत महादेवकर, लेखा सद" के सम!। ] ] Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member And Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं /ITA No.168/Ahd/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : N.A. Patani Yuva Samaj Sewa Trust The CIT (Exemption) बनाम/ Salempura Darwaja Ahmedabad – 380 015 v/s. Jantanagar Road Jantanagar, Palanpur Banaskantha – 385 001 "थायी लेखा सं./PAN: AAETP 1570 G (अपीलाथ$/ Appellant) (%& यथ$/ Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Mehul Thakkar, AR Revenue by : Shri R.P. Rastogi, CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 18/08/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 19/08/2025 आदेश/O R D E R

Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

1.

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld.CIT(E)’] dated 22/11/2024, rejecting the application of the assessee-trust for approval u/s.80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

2.

At the outset, the Ld.Counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(E) to submit that the main object of the assessee is eduction and enviornmental protection. That the Ld.CIT(E) Patani Yuva Samaj Sewa Trust vs. The CIT(E)

2 rejected the application for approval of the assessee u/s.80G(5) of the Act on the ground that one of the objects of the assessee-trust was religious in nature. The said object pointed out by the ld.CIT(E), reads as under: ”To install, maintain and run community halls, Satsang Halls, Pray Halls, Wadi and to celebrate religious and national festivals.”

3.

A perusal of the aforesaid object of the assessee-trust would reveal that the said object is a general in nature, i.e. to construct community-halls for various social/community funcitons including satsnag, prayers and to celebrate religious and national festivals. The above object, in our view, is a general object to construct halls for various social/community functions. The above object in no manner propagates any religion. Therefore, the finding of the Ld.CIT(E) that the aforesaid object is religious in nature is not correct. The denial of approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act, because of the aforesaid reason is not justified. Therefore, the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(E) is set aside and the matter is restored to file of the Ld.CIT(E) for decision afresh on the application of the assessee for approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act, with a direction to grant approval to the assessee-trust if the assessee is otherwise found eligible for the same irrespective of the aforesaid object.

More judgments on Section 80G(5)

All 2,236 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G(5) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →