← Back to search

SHALOM BHAKTI MANDALI,DAHOD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

PDF
ITA 312/AHD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 August 20253 pages

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद ायपीठ “बी“,अहमदाबाद ।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

ी संजय गग, ाियक सद एवं
ी मकरंद वसंत महादेवकर, लेखा सद के सम!।
]
]

Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member And Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountant Member

आयकर अपील सं /ITA No.312/Ahd/2025
िनधारण वष /Assessment Year : N.A.

Shalom Bhakti Mandali
Hathila Sureshkumar P.
Derasar Road, Delsar
Dahod – 389 151 (Gujarat)
बनाम/
v/s.

The CIT (Exemption)
Ahmedabad- 380 015
थायी लेखा सं./PAN: AAWTS 4218 E

(अपीलाथ$/ Appellant)

(%& यथ$/ Respondent)

Assessee by :
Shri Mehul K. Patel, Advocate
Revenue by :
Shri R.P. Rastogi, CIT-DR

सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 20/08/2025
घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 26/08/2025

आदेश/O R D E R

Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

The captioned appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad
[hereinafter referred to as “Ld.CIT(E)”], dated 22/10/2024, rejecting the application of the assessee for final/regular registration u/s.12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”),

2.

There is a delay of 41 days in filing the present appeal. A separate application along with Affidavit of Trustee of the appellant has been filed for condonation of delay. Considering the averments made in the application as Shalom Bhakti Mandali vs. CIT(E) well as the shortness of delay, the delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.

3.

The Ld.Counsel for the assessee submitted that neither the appellant was conversant with the Income Tax matters nor having knowledge to operate computers or login to the Income Tax Portal. The alleged notices of hearing issued by the Ld.CIT(E) did not come to the notice of the assessee- trust resulting into passing of the ex-parte order of the Ld. CIT(E). The Ld.Counsel submitted that non-compliance of the notices by the assessee before the Ld.CIT(E) was not intentional. The Ld.Counsel has submitted that the assessee has a fair case on merits and that it may be granted an opportunity to present its case before the Ld.CIT(E).

4.

The Ld.Departmental Representative (DR) however, has relied upon the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(E).

5.

Considering the rival submissions, we are of the view that the interests of justice will be well served, if the assessee is given an opportunity to present its case before the Ld.CIT(E). Accordingly, the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(E) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Ld.CIT(E) for decision afresh on the application of the assessee. Needless to say, that the Ld.CIT(E) will give proper and adequate opportunity to the assessee to present its case and furnish the requisite details/documents, thereafter to decide the application of the assessee in accordance with law. The Ld.CIT(E) will decide the application within 90 days from the receipt of this order. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 26 /08/2025. (Makarand V. Mahadeokar) Accountant Member अहमदाबाद/Ahmedabad, िदनांक/Dated 26/08/2025

टी.सी.नायर, व.िन.स./T.C. NAIR, Sr. PS

आदेश की #ितिलिप अ$ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1.

अपीलाथ% / The Appellant 2. #&थ% / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु' / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु' ) अपील ( / The CIT(E)- Ahmedabad 5. िवभागीय #ितिनिध , अिधकरण

अपीलीय

आयकर
,
अहमदाबाद /DR,ITAT, Ahmedabad.
6. गाड फाईल /
Guard file.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,

स&ािपत #ित ////

सहायक पंजीकार (Asstt.

SHALOM BHAKTI MANDALI,DAHOD vs THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD | BharatTax