YUVA GAYATRI PARIWAR TRUST,ANAND vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(E)'s decision, concluding that the assessee failed to demonstrate that its expenditure for stated charitable activities (education, health, environment) was within the permissible limits for a non-religious trust. The significant religious expenditure (38.53%) without adequate supporting evidence for other charitable purposes justified the rejection of the Section 80G(5) approval.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Yuva Gayatri Pariwar Trust, initially received provisional registration and 80G approval. It applied for final approval under Section 80G(5), but the CIT(E) rejected the application, citing that the trust's religious expenditure (38.53% of total income) exceeded the permissible 5% limit and that the trust failed to provide sufficient evidence of non-religious charitable activities. The appeal against this rejection was filed belatedly, but the delay was condoned by the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether a trust that incurs religious expenditure exceeding 5% of its total income and fails to provide sufficient evidence for other declared charitable activities is eligible for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH
Before: Dr. BRR Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble
Per Suchitra Kamble, Judicial Member:
This is an appeal filed against the order dated 23-10- 2024 passed by CIT(E), Ahmedabad for assessment year nil.
The grounds of appeal are as under:- “1. The ld Commissioner of Income Tax, Exmp., Ahmedabad has erred in law in rejecting the application for approval in Form No. 10AB under clause (iii) of first proviso to Sec. 80G(5) of the Act on the ground that trust is for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste.
The ld Commissioner of Income Tax, Exmp., Ahmedabad has also erred in law in rejecting the approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Act considering that the appellant trust is having objects of religious nature.
The ld Commiss
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026