RANJIT DHARAMSINHBHAI DESAI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(2)(3), AHMEDABAD
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA & SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR
PER: ANNAPURNA GUPTA - AM:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”), National Faceless Appeal Centre (in short
“NFAC”), Delhi dated 09.07.2024 passed under Section 250 of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) and relates to Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2018-19. 2. The Registry has noted the appeal is time barred by 151 days. No application for seeking condonation of delay has been filed by the assessee.
Asst.Year –2018-19
present for the assessee. It seems that the assessee is not interested in pursuing the appeal. However, since the assessee has not adduced any reasonable cause for the delay in filing of appeal, the same is not condoned by us and the appeal, as a consequence, is dismissed as non-maintainable.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is, therefore, dismissed. This Order pronounced in Open Court on 08/09/2025 (T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR) (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) Ahmedabad; Dated 08/09/2025
TANMAY, Sr. PSआदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
अपीलाथŎ / The Appellant 2. ŮȑथŎ / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयुƅ / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयुƅ(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाडŊ फाईल / Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.