AKSHAR ELECINFRA PRIVATE LIMITED,VADODARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1 (1) (1), VADODARA, VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the disallowance was technical in nature, acknowledging that the claim related to earlier years and the portal did not allow filing Form 10DA without new employment. Considering this technical barrier, the matter was restored to the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer for verification and allowance of the claim.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs.7,02,975/- under Section 80JJAA for AY 2021-22, which was a continuation from earlier years for which Form 10DA had been filed. The deduction was disallowed by the CPC under Section 143(1) and upheld by the CIT(A) solely because Form 10DA was not filed for the current year, despite the assessee's claim that no new employment was made and the e-filing portal had technical issues preventing the filing. The AR argued that the non-filing was due to technical issues on the portal.
What were the issues?
Whether a deduction under Section 80JJAA can be disallowed due to non-filing of Form 10DA for a continuing claim in a subsequent year, when no new employees were hired and the e-filing portal posed technical difficulties for filing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 80JJAA,Section 80JJAA(2)(c),Section 143(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 1. ��थ� / The Respondent. 2. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / Concerned CIT 3. 4. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, True Copy
More judgments on Section 80JJAA
- Vaishnavi Enterprises, Pune vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 8…ITA 3464/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Schwarz Sperren Intelligence and Security… vs Income Tax Officer, Kautilya BhavanITA 7072/MUM/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-2021
- Neptune Holidays Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 8(2), KolkataITA 1958/KOL/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Neptune Holidays Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 8(2), KolkataITA 1957/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2015-2016
- 3 Generations, Delhi vs DCIT, Circle-49(1), DelhiITA 2741/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026