SAFALI MAHENDRAKUMAR PATEL,ANAND vs. THE ITO, WARD-4, ANAND
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYALSafali Mahendrakumar Patel, Ishwar Smruti, B/h. Gunatit Jyot Na, Shree Ram Vihar, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Anand, VV Nagar, Gujarat-388120
PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:-
Delay Condoned.
This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order dated
20.12.2023 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals), National
Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ in short), under Section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ in short), relating to the Assessment Year
2012-13. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds :
“1. The Assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the I.T. Act dated
16.12.2019 is bad in law and liable to be quashed and Ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding the same as valid.
Ld. CIT(A) (NFAC) has erred in law and on facts in sustaining the addition made by Ld. Assessing Officer of Rs.18,19,000/- u/s 69 of the I.T. Act. ”
In this case, the assessee did not file a return of income for the relevant Assessment Year 2012–13. On the basis of information received that the assessee had purchased an immovable property valued at Rs.69,36,000/-, the Assessing Asst. Year : 2012-13 - 2– Officer reopened the assessment under section 147 of the Act. During the course of reassessment proceedings, it was submitted by the assessee that the assessee’s share in the said property was one-fourth, amounting to Rs.18,19,000/-. As the assessee failed to satisfactorily explain the source of this investment, the Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs.18,19,000/- under section 69 of the Act as unexplained investment. On appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), no compliance was made by the assessee. Hence, the Ld. CIT(A) adjudicated the matter ex-parte, based on the statement of facts, grounds of appeal, and assessment records, and upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer.
Aggrieved by the orders of the authorities below, the assessee is now in appeal before the Tribunal.
We have perused the order of the authorities below and the material placed on record. It is a matter of record that despite multiple opportunities, the assessee failed to appear or file any submissions before the Ld. CIT(A), leading to ex-parte disposal of the appeal. We are, however, of the considered view that the assessee should be granted one final opportunity to present her case. We, therefore, set aside the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 20.12.2023 and restore the matter to his file for fresh adjudication, de novo, after giving due opportunity to the assessee. The assessee is directed to fully cooperate with the proceedings and respond to the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A) without seeking unwarranted adjournments.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
The order is pronounced in the open Court on 17.09.2025. (SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL)
VICE-PRESIDENT
Ahmedabad; Dated 17.09.2025
**btk
Asst. Year : 2012-13
- 3–
आदेश की ितिलिप अ ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
अपीलाथ / The Appellant 2. थ / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधतआयकरआयु / Concerned CIT 4. आयकरआयु(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीयितिनिध, आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण, अहमदाबाद/ DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड फाईल/ Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.