← Back to search

PAKSH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD

PDF
ITA 1472/AHD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 October 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE

For Appellant: Shri SN Divetia, with Shri Samir Vora, AR
For Respondent: Shri Sudhakar Verma, Sr. DR
Hearing: 07.10.2025Pronounced: 14.10.2025

PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:-

Delay Condoned

The captioned appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),
/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, vide order dated 04.05.2023
relevant to the Assessment Year 2016-17. 3. On perusal of the records, it is observed that notice of hearing was duly served upon the assessee to furnish the requisite details,
Asst. Year : 2016-17
- 2–

clarifications, and explanations in support of the claim pertaining to unsecured loans taken from various parties. In response, assessee has submitted additional evidences to substantiate its claim but the same was not considered by the Ld.CIT(A) and appeal of the assessee was consequently dismissed. Therefore, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee prayed that, given an opportunity, the assessee would produce all necessary details, clarifications, and documentary evidence before the Revenue authorities in support of her claim. We also find that the assessee failed to establish the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the creditors in respect of the unsecured loans even before the Assessing Officer. In view of the above and in the interest of natural justice, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment, with a direction to verify the documentary evidence to be furnished by the assessee and decide the matter in accordance with law. The assessee shall submit all relevant bank statements, documents, and supporting evidence, and to cooperate fully with the Revenue authorities without seeking unnecessary adjournments.
4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

The order is pronounced in the open Court on 14.10.2025. (SUCHITRA KAMBLE)
VICE-PRESIDENT

() ()
Ahmedabad; Dated 14.10.2025

MV
Asst. Year : 2016-17
- 3–

आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1.

अपीलाथŎ / The Appellant 2. ŮȑथŎ / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधतआयकरआयुƅ / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयुƅ(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाडŊ फाईल / Guard file.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.

PAKSH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD | BharatTax