← Back to search

SHRI VICKY RAJESH LALWANI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-7(2)(5), AHMEDABAD

PDF
ITA 1811/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 November 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-SHRI TR SENTHIL KUMARShri Vicky Rajesh Lalwani, D-433, 4th Floor, Gita Mandir Road, Sumel Business Park-3, Raipur, Ahmedabad-380002. [PAN :AHAPL9760 F]

For Appellant: Shri Mohit Balani, AR
For Respondent: Shri Rameshwar P Meena Sr. DR
Hearing: 11.11.2025Pronounced: 13.11.2025

PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:-

Delay Condoned

This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the appellate order dated 25.04.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals)National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, relating to the Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

1.

Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on the facts of the case in passing the impugned order, exparte. Asst. Year : 2017-18 - 2–

2.

Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on the facts in confirming the action of AO in making an addition of Rs.1,00,43,836/- as unexplained money u/s.69A of the Act.

3.

Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts of the case in invoking the provisions of S.115BBE of the Act.

4.

Alternatively, and without prejudice, the addition may kindly be limited to the peak credit amount.

5.

Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on the facts in confirming the action of AO in charging interest u/s.234A/B/C/D.

6.

Learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on the facts in confirming the action of AO in initiating penalty u/s.271AAC of the Act which is wholly unsustainable in law and on facts of the case.

3.

On perusal of the records, it is observed that the assessee was afforded sufficient opportunities of hearing to furnish details, clarifications, and explanations to substantiate the source of cash deposits. However, despite being granted multiple opportunities, the assessee failed to furnish the requisite details or explanations before the Ld. CIT(A). Consequently, the Ld. CIT(A), based on the material available on record, upheld the action of the Assessing Officer and dismissed the appeal of the assessee as ex-parte. We also find that the assessee remained non-compliant before the Assessing Officer and failed or furnish any documentary evidence in support of cash deposits treated as unexplained money. Before us, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee prayed that, given an opportunity, all necessary details, clarifications, and explanations would be furnished to the Revenue authorities. Hence, in the interest of justice, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication. The assessee shall submit all the relevant bank statement/submission/document before the Assessing Officer and comply Asst. Year : 2017-18 - 3–

with the notices issued by the revenue authorities without seeking any unnecessary adjournments.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

The order is pronounced in the open Court on 13.11.2025. S
/- (TR SENTHIL KUMAR)
VICE-PRESIDENT

()
Ahmedabad; Dated 13.11.2025
MV

आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1.

अपीलाथŎ / The Appellant 2. ŮȑथŎ / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधतआयकरआयुƅ / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयुƅ(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाडŊ फाईल / Guard file.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.

SHRI VICKY RAJESH LALWANI,AHMEDABAD vs THE ITO, WARD-7(2)(5), AHMEDABAD | BharatTax