DCIT, CIRCLE-12(2), NEW DELHI vs. INTERGLOBE TECHNOLOGY QUOTIENT PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the deduction, noting that the issue was decided in favour of the assessee in prior assessment years by the Tribunal and the High Court.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 62,81,45,818/- under Section 10AA for software export and IT-enabled services. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, following previous years' disallowances.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 10AA for software export and IT-enabled services, considering previous favourable rulings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE & SHRI K.N. CHARY
PER K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JM Challenging the order dated 25 1999-2000 17 in appeal No. 712/2016-17/CIT(A), passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, New Delhi (“Ld. CIT(A)”), in the case of M/s Interglobe technology quotient Pvt. Ltd (“the assessee”) for the assessment year 2014- 15, Revenue preferred this appeal disputing the allowing the claim of Rs. 62, 81, 45, 818/-towards deduction under section 10AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) on the ground that the Ld. CIT(A) did not examine the fact whether or not the assessee is said to be engaged in the business of software export to be eligible for deduction under section 10AA of the Act.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of software development and provides information technology-enabled services from its unit located in the SEZ area, and for the assessment year 2014-15 they have claimed deduction of an amount of Rs. 62,81,45,818/- u/s 10AA of the Act.
During the assessment proceeding, it was observed by the AO that the assessee has claimed an exemption of Rs. 62,81,45,818/- u/s 10-AA of the I.T. Act claiming to have been engaged in the field of export of data processing services doing business of software development & providing Information Technology enabled service from Special Economic zone, Noida and this was the 8th year of claim u/s 10-AA, but such claim of the assessee was disallowed on the ground that in all assessment years starting from 2007-08, such a claim was disallowed. According to the learned Assessing Officer the reasons for disallowing the exemption claimed u/s 10AA in the assessment orders passed for earlier assessment years were found to be valid for the AY 2014-15 also. Learned Assessing Officer, therefore, following the earlier years, held that the assessee company did not fulfil the criteria for claim of exemption u/s 10AA of the Act, and accordingly he disallowed the claim of assessee amounting to Rs 62,81,45,818/- u/s 10AA.
Assessee preferred appeal against such order and contended that the assessee had met all the conditions u/s 10AA. Ld. CIT(A) having considered all the facts of the case observed that he had already decided the issue of allowability of deduction u/s 10AA in the favour of assessee for Asstt. Year 2012-13 vide order dated 31/08/2017 Ld. CIT(A) allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2014-15 also.
There is no dispute that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) for the assessment year 2012-13 was based on the order of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case on the same issue of allowability of deduction under section 10AA for Assessment year 2007-08 to 2010-11 vide order dated 26th July 2016 in 5830/Del/2011, 1463/Del/2013 and 6144/Del/2013 in which it has been held that the assessee is eligible for the claimed deduction under sec. 10AA of the Act, 1961, and such finding of the Tribunal was upheld by Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court, Delhi in the case of appellant in ITA No. 330/2017 for AY 2010-11 vide order dated 22nd May, 2017. Since the issue is identical and keeping in the consistent view taken by the Tribunal as upheld by the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court it cannot be said that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) suffers any illegality or irregularity so as to invite our interference in this appeal. Since the Ld. CIT(A) followed the binding precedent we uphold the same and consequently find that the appeal is devoid of merits.
Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court immediately after the conclusion of the hearing in the Virtual Court on 30/12/2020.
More judgments on Section 10AA
- Quantium Analytics Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(3), HyderabadITA 1336/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Ab Knowledge Systems, Pune vs DCIT, PuneITA 92/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Circle-4(1)(1), Bangalore vs Eygbs(India) Private Limited, BangaloreITA 1886/BANG/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- ACIT 15(1)(2), Mumbai vs Galaxy Surfactants Limited, MumbaiITA 6984/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2011-2012
- Genpact Infrastructure (Hyderabad) Pvt… vs ITO, New DelhiITA 2055/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2009-10
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026