RADHIKA ABHISHEK FAMILY TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD 1(3)(1), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of the entire interest received (Rs. 9,64,603/-) without considering the corresponding interest expenditure incurred by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the AO was not justified in making this addition.
What were the facts?
The assessee received an interest amount of Rs. 9.64 lakhs from Avishkar Trading Company, and also received Rs. 1.40 crores from Shri Chirag Ashokbhai Sheth, a portion of which was given as a loan to M/s. Aavishkar Trading Company. The assessee paid interest of Rs. 7,62,520/- and received interest of Rs. 9,64,603/-, offering Rs. 1,84,500/- for taxation.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO was justified in making an addition of the entire interest income without considering the interest expenditure incurred by the assessee, especially when a portion of the income was offered for taxation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG
Assessment Year : 2020-21 Radhika Abhishek Family Trust The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1) Akshay, 1st Floor, Shrimali Vs Ahmedabad. Society, Navrangpura Ahmedabad. PAN : AADTR 8375 G (Applicant) (Responent) Assessee by : Shri Deepak R. Shah, AR : Revenue by Shri Ravindra, ld.SR.DR सुनवाई क� तारीख/Date of Hearing : 18/12/2025 घोषणा क� तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 18/12/2025 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश
The above appeal has been preferred by the assessee against order passed by the Ld.Commissioner of Income-Tax(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “ld.CIT(A)] dated 25.09.2025 under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short) for the assessment year 2020-21.
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
1. The ld.CIT(A) erred in law and in the facts of the case in upholding the order of the AO in making an addition of Rs.9,64,603/- under section 69A of the Act.”
3. Short issue involved in this appeal, as raised by the ld.counsel for the assessee during the course of hearing is that the ld.AO has made an addition of Rs.9.64 lakhs despite the fact that the assessee has already offered the said amount for taxation in his return of income.
2 4. The ld.AR has demonstrated from the assessment order, itself, that the AO had got the information that the assessee had received an interest amount of Rs.9.64 lakhs from ‘Avishkar Trading Company’ as per the TDS statement. The AO, therefore, reopened the assessment of the assessee under section 147 of the Act and asked the assessee as to why tax has not been paid on the aforesaid interest amount received by the assessee. In response, the assessee filed return of income, and further demonstrated to the AO that the assessee had received an amount of Rs.1.40 crores from Shri Chirag Ashokbhai Sheth and that the amount was further given to M/s.Aavishkar Trding Company as loan during the year under consideration. The assessee paid interest of Rs.7,62,520/- to Shri Chirag Ashokbhai Sheth, and received interest of Rs.9,64,603/- from M/s.Aavishkar Trading Company. The assessee, however, offered income of Rs.1,84,500/- for taxation in the return filed in pursuance to the notice under section 147 of the Act.
The ld.DR could not rebut the aforesaid factual aspects of the case.
In view of this, the AO was not justified in making impugned addition of Rs.9,64,603/- i.e. of the entire interest amount received by the assessee by ignoring the corresponding interest expenditure incurred by the assessee. The said addition is accordingly ordered to be deleted.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed. Order pronounced on 18th December, 2025.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026