LAXMAN RUPCHAND KHAIRNAR,NASHIK vs. WARD 1(1) NASHIK, INCOME TAX OFFICER

When the appeal was called for, none appeared on behalf of the assessee despite service of notice of hearing. However, the assessee filed a letter seeking withdrawal of the instant appeal as the assesee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The contents of said letter read as under : “Sub : Intimation of withdrawal of appeal due to opting the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (Revised)-2024. Shri Laxman Rupchand Khairnar, Nashik against appellate order u/s 250 passed by CIT (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi and appeal filed before your honor vide Appeal No. ITA/1982/20244 in respect of A.Y.2018-19.(ΡΑΝ- ABNPK4895P) Please refer to the above. As I was preferred an appeal before your honor as per details mentioned above, But I was filed application under the scheme of Government namely Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (Revised)- 2024 and also received Form N.2 from the Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik for payment of dispute amount of Tax and arrears. The said amount was paid by me and also submit Form No.3 to the Hon'ble Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik. Considering the above, I wish to withdraw my appeal filed before your honor and I will submit the Full and Final settlement certificate in Form No. 4 whenever received to me by the competent authority. Hence, it is requested to kindly keep my appeal decision in abeyance upto submission of Form No. 4.”

Ld. Departmental Representative has no objection. However, in view of the assessee’s application seeking withdrawal of the appeal, the appeal is being dismissed as ‘Withdrawn’ subject to rider that in case the assessee’s Vivad Se Vishwas Laxman Rupchand Khairnar

अपीलाथ / The Appellant. 2. यथ / The Respondent. 3. The Pr. CIT concerned. 4. िवभागीय ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “(SMC)” बच, पुणे/ DR, ITAT, “(SMC)” Bench, Pune. 5. गाड फ़ाइल / Guard File.