RAVI SHIVANGEKAR ,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 13(4), PUNE, PUNE
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE “B” BENCH : PUNE
Before: SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER RAMA KANTA PANDA, V.P. :
This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order dated 09.10.2024 of the learned CIT(A)-National
Faceless Appeal Centre [in short the “NFAC”] Delhi, for assessment year 2020-2021. 2. Learned Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submitted that assessee has filed an application with the Department to settle the dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme-2024, for which, assessee has already filed
Form-1, copy of which is enclosed and Form-2 is awaited. He, therefore, submitted that since the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024, therefore, assessee
2
ITA.No.2588/PUN./2024
wants to withdraw the appeal. In absence of any objection from the side of the Learned DR, the request of the assessee seeking for withdrawal of the appeal is allowed and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. In the result, appeal of the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 15.01.2025. [VINAY BHAMORE]
[RAMA KANTA PANDA]
JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT
Pune, Dated 15th January, 2025
VBP/-
Copy to 1. The appellant
2. The respondent
3. The CIT(A), Pune concerned.
4. D.R. ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune.
5. Guard File.
//By Order//
////
Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Pune Benches,
Pune.