MEENAMANI GANGA BUILDER LLP,PUNE vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal, noting that the Assessing Officer made no addition after verification of issues, rendering the appeal academic. The appeal was dismissed as 'Withdrawn'.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the PCIT u/s.263 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, which arose from an assessment order passed u/s.153A. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed against the PCIT's order can be withdrawn by the assessee when the underlying issues have become academic.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “A”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
आदेश / ORDER
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The captioned appeal pertaining to the Assessment Year 2017-18 at the instance of assessee is directed against the order dated 12.03.2024 passed by PCIT (Central), Pune u/s.263 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’ which inturn is arising out of the Assessment order dated 20.04.2021 passed u/s.153A of the Act.
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee filed a letter dated 28.01.2024 seeking withdrawal of the appeal filed by assessee for the reason that pursuant to the order passed by the ld.PCIT(Central), Pune the ld. Assessing Officer after verification of the issues has made no addition. Therefore, the appeal has become academic in nature. In this regard, ld. Counsel also filed the copy of assessment order dated 24.12.2024 passed u/s.153A r.w.s.263 of the Act. Ld. Departmental Representative has no objection for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee. We therefore allow the request of the assessee to withdraw the appeal filed by it.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as ‘Withdrawn’.
Order pronounced on this 30th day of January, 2025.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026