ANIL KUMAR MALIK,HARYANA vs. JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD 11(3), PUNE, RANGE CODE-52, MAHARASHTRA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2797/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 January 2025AY 2020-2021Bench: MS. ASTHA CHANDRA (Judicial Member), SHRI DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed an application to withdraw the appeal due to an incorrect jurisdiction and that the Department had no objection. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Addl./JCIT. Subsequently, the assessee filed an application to withdraw the appeal, stating it was inadvertently filed in the wrong jurisdiction.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can withdraw the appeal due to filing in the wrong jurisdiction.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, PUNE

Before: MS. ASTHA CHANDRA & SHRI DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE

आदेश / ORDER

PER ASTHA CHANDRA, JM :

1.

The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 28.10.2024 of the Ld. Addl./JCIT (A)-1, Jaipur pertaining to Assessment Year 2020-21.

2.

The assessee has filed an application to withdraw the appeal. The relevant extract of the application reads as under : “We are writing in reference to the aforementioned appeal, filed on 23.12.2024. We wish to inform the Hon'ble Bench that the current appeal was inadvertently filed in the wrong jurisdiction, as noted in the defects sheet indicating an error in the "Respondent Name & Designation and Address in Respondent Personal Information." Upon correcting these details in Form 36, it became clear that the appropriate jurisdiction is Delhi. In light of this oversight, we respectfully request the Hon'ble Tribunal grant us the liberty to withdraw the current appeal. We extend our apologies for any inconvenience caused and assure the Hon'ble Bench that we will refile within the correct jurisdiction in a timely manner.”

3.

Miss Indira R. Adakil, representing the Department submitted that the Department has no objection in case the assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal.

4.

In view of the above request of the assessee, the appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open court on 31st January, 2025.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →