← Back to search

DHAVALBUILDERS,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 12(1), PUNE

PDF
ITA 2406/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 February 20255 pages

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ”ए” Ɋायपीठ पुणेमŐ।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
PUNE BENCHES “A” :: PUNE

BEFORE DR.MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.2406/PUN/2024
िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ / Assessment Year: 2015-16
Dhavel Builders,
470, Dattatraya Nivas,
Kumthekar Road, Sadashiv
Peth, Pune – 411030. PAN: AAHFD8228J
V s
The Income Tax Officer,
Ward-12(1), Pune.
Appellant / Assessee

Respondent / Revenue

Assessee by Shri Sarvesh Kandelwal – AR
Revenue by Shri Ramnath P Murkunde – DR
Date of hearing
17/02/2025
Date of pronouncement 20/02/2025

आदेश/ ORDER

PER DR. MANISH BORAD, AM:

This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income
Tax(Appeals)[NFAC]
for ITA No.2406/PUN/2024 [A]

2
Assessment Year 2015-16 dated 30.09.2024 passed u/sec.250 of the Income tax Act, 1961. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and the provisions of the Act it will be held that the assessee be given one more opportunity and his case be heard on merit. Just and proper relief be granted to the assessee.

2.

On the facts and circumstances of the case and the provisions of the Act it will be held that the income is not assessable u/s 69A. Consequently, the income tax is not to be computed u/s 115BBE. The income be assessed as regular business income attracting regular rates of tax applicable to the assessee. Just and proper relief be granted to the assessee.

3.

On facts & circumstances prevailing in the case & as per provisions of the Act it be held that income for AY 2015-16 should have been assessed at Rs. 91,87,816/-which is as per the accounts & tax audit report filed prior to the receipt of notice u/s 148. Just & proper relief be granted to the assessee on this score.

4.

The appellant prays to be allowed to add, to rectify modify, amend, delete, and raise any grounds of appeal at the time of hearing.”

ITA No.2406/PUN/2024 [A]

3
2. At the outset of hearing, ld.Counsel for the assessee stated that for unavoidable reasons, assessee could not appear before the ld.CIT(A)/NFAC and since the assessee has a prima-facie good case, matter may please be restored to ld.CIT(A) for afresh adjudication.

3.

On the other hand, ld.DR for the revenue relied on the order of Lower Authorities.

4.

We have heard rival contentions and perused the record placed before us. We observe that the assessee was given multiple opportunities by ld.CIT(A) to plead its grounds of appeal. However, assessee failed to respond to the notice of hearing dated 10.09.2024, 19.09.2024 and 24.09.2024 through ITBA Portal. The assessee has also furnished an Affidavit mentioning the reasons for non-appearance which are mainly on account of notices having been sent on the email id which was not ITA No.2406/PUN/2024 [A]

4
in regular use by the assessee. Considering the fact that Faceless
Proceedings have been launched recently and there are some assessees’ who are not well-versed with the technical aspects of New Faceless Scheme and even though ld.CIT(A) has dealt the issue on the merits of the case, however, the finding arrived by the ld.CIT(A) are without hearing of the assessee.

5.

We therefore, in the interest of justice and being fair to both the parties deem it appropriate to give one more opportunity to the assessee and restore the issue raised on merit to ld.CIT(A)/NFAC for afresh adjudication to be carried out in accordance with Law. The Assessee is directed to provide correct Email-Id to the Department for getting notices through ITBA portal. Assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and not to seek adjournment unless otherwise required. Accordingly, grounds of appeals raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.

ITA No.2406/PUN/2024 [A]

6.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open Court on 20th February, 2025. (VINAY BHAMORE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 20th Feb, 2025/ SGR* आदेशकᳱᮧितिलिपअᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant. 2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent. 3. The CIT(A), concerned. 4. The Pr. CIT, concerned. 5. िवभागीयᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “ए” बᱶच, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune.

6.

गाडᭅफ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,

////
Senior Private Secretary

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे/ITAT, Pune.

DHAVALBUILDERS,PUNE vs ITO WARD 12(1), PUNE | BharatTax