SHRI VACHASPATI EDUCATIONAL TRUST,THANE vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal as there was no objection from the Revenue. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order rejecting their application for registration under Section 12AB of the IT Act. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal due to an inadvertent error in mentioning the wrong jurisdiction in the appeal memo and having filed a corrected appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to an inadvertent error in the appeal memo.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
Assessment Year : 2025-26 Shri Vachaspati Educational Vs. CIT, Exemption, Pune. Trust, B/501, Varsha Tower, Sai Baba Nagar- 401107. PAN : AAHTS4584L Appellant Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari : Date of hearing : 26.03.2025 Date of pronouncement : 26.03.2025 आदेश / ORDER
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 20.11.2024 passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejecting the application for registration u/s 12AB of the IT Act.
When the matter had come up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee despite due service of notice of hearing. However, the appellant filed a letter seeking permission to withdraw the above captioned appeal. It was mentioned in the Assessing Officer was mentioned as Pune, whereas the correct jurisdiction is Thane. As soon as the mistake was realized the assessee sent an email on 28.02.2025 to the Registry of ITAT, Pune Bench, Pune requesting for withdrawal of above appeal. It is further submitted that the assessee has already filed corrected appeal on 03.03.2025 before ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai. Under the above facts prayer was made to permit withdrawal of the above said appeal.
Ld. DR had expressed no objection to permit the withdrawal of the appeal.
In the circumstances, we hereby grant permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the above captioned appeal stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026