ANKITA ANIL SHINDE ,SINDHUDURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KUDAL WARD, SINDHUDURG

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE

BEFORE SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.104/PUN/2024
िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ / Assessment Year : 2013-14

Ankita Anil Shinde,
House
No.505,
Village
Bordave, Taluka Kankavali,
Sindhudurg- 416603. PAN : BJBPS6155D
Vs. ITO,
Kudal
Ward,
Sindhudurg.
Appellant

Respondent

आदेश / ORDER

PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 01.12.2023 passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC for the assessment year 2013-14. 2. When the matter was called for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee, however, an application was filed seeking permission to withdraw the above captioned appeal in the light of the fact that the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,
2024. Assessee by : None
Revenue by : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde

Date of hearing
: 29.01.2025
Date of pronouncement : 26.03.2025
2
3. Ld. DR has no objection to permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal.
4. We are inclined to grant the permission to the appellant herein to withdraw the appeal with the liberty to the appellant to revive the appeal proceedings, in the event of the Pr. Commissioner of Income
Tax declining to issue Final Certificate under Direct Tax Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme, 2024 for whatsoever reasons. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.
5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.
Order pronounced on 26th day of March, 2025. (MANISH BORAD)
JUDICIAL MEMBER

पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 26th March, 2025. Sujeet
आदेश कᳱ ᮧितिलिप अᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant.
2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent.
3. The Pr. CIT concerned.
4. िवभागीय ᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “A” बᱶच,
पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune.

////
Senior Private Secretary

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.