CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA EMPLOYEES CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD KOLHAPUR,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to appear and the order was ex-parte. Without delving into the merits, the Tribunal remitted the issue to the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC for fresh adjudication, ensuring a proper opportunity of hearing for the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Co-operative Society, failed to file a return of income for AY 2018-19. The case was reopened under Section 147, and an addition was made. The assessee failed to appear before the Ld. CIT(A) and the addition was confirmed. The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i)/80P(2)(d) for interest income.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be remitted for fresh adjudication due to the assessee's non-appearance and whether the claim for deduction under Section 80P is valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 80P(2)(a)(i),Section 80P(2)(d)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
This appeal at the instance of assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi dated 25.03.2024 which is arising out the order u/s. 143(3) of the Act for Assessment Year 2017-18 framed by ITO, Ward-1(1), Kolhapur.
When the appeal was called for, none appeared on behalf of the assessee even though proper notice of hearing was issued and served. However, with the assistance of Ld. Departmental Representative, we notice that the impugned order is ex-parte as the assessee failed to attend the hearing and did not file any submissions/documents.
We have heard the Ld. DR and perused the record placed before us. The assessee is a Co-operative Society and no return of income was filed for AY 2018-19. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was reopened u/s. 147 of the Act and the assessment was completed on 13.03.2023 after making an addition of Rs.1,63,447/-. The assessee failed to succeed before the Ld. CIT(A) as it failed to respond to the notices and the addition made by the Ld. Assessing Officer was confirmed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the claim of the assessee that it is entitled to deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i)/80P(2)(d) of the Act for the interest income earned on fixed deposits kept with the Co-operative Banks. In view thereof, without dwelling into merits of the issues considering the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee and in the larger interest of justice and being fair of both the parties, we remit the issue raised on merits in the instant case to the file of the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC for necessary adjudication, in accordance with law. Needless to mention that proper opportunity of hearing shall be granted to the assessee. The assessee is directed to remain vigilant and not to take adjournment unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. Effective grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on this 28th day of March, 2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026