SHRI GANESH URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), AURANGABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the interest income earned by a co-operative society from investments in other co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The decision followed precedents from the Tribunal's co-ordinate benches.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative credit society, claimed a deduction of Rs. 48,01,504/- on interest income earned from investments made with co-operative banks. The Assessing Officer denied this deduction, and the CIT(A) upheld the denial.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a co-operative credit society from its investments in co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
This appeal at the instance of assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi dated 13.12.2024 which is arising out the order u/s. 143(3) of the Act for Assessment Year 2016-17 framed by ITO, Ward-1(4), Aurangabad.
The sole grievance of the assessee is that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in denying the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d)/80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act for the of Rs.48,01,504/- earned from investment made with Co-operative Banks.
At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the case of the assessee is squarely covered by the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Shri Ganesh Urban Cooperative Credit Society Limited Vs. ITO in for AY 2017-18 vide order dated 21.06.2024 and held that the interest earned from the Co-operative Bank is eligible for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act.
On the other hand, the Ld. Departmental Representative failed to controvert the contentions made by the Ld. AR by placing any other binding precedents.
We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record placed before us. The assessee has been denied the benefit of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act for the interest income of Rs.48,01,504/- earned from investment with Co- operative Banks. The facts remain undisputed that the alleged sum is the interest income from deposits with Co-operative banks which are basically Co-operative Societies. The decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Shri Ganesh Urban Cooperative Credit Society Limited (supra), it has been held that the interest earned from Co-operative Bank is eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Similar view has also been taken consistently by this Tribunal in plethora of the decisions including that of Samarth Nagari Sahkari Pat Sanstha Maryadit Vs. ITO in for AY 2020-21 vide order dated 03.05.2024. Respectfully, following the same and taking consistent view, we are inclined to hold in favour of the assessee and direct the Ld. Assessing Officer to allow the claim of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act for the alleged sum of interest income of Rs.48,01,504/- earned from investments with Co-operative Banks. The finding of Ld. CIT(A) is reversed and the ground No. 1 raised by the assessee is allowed.
Ground No. 2 raised by the assessee being consequential in nature, needs no adjudication.
Ground No. 3 raised by the assessee is general in nature, hence, requires no adjudication.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced on this 28th day of March, 2025.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7044/MUM/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7043/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Suvarnakarara Co-Operative Society Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2, KarwarITA 210/PAN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026