No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM & SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 347 & 348/JP/2016
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR Jh Hkkxpan] ys[kk lnL; ,oa Jh dqy Hkkjr] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM & SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 347 & 348/JP/2016 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2012-13 cuke Bhoj Raj Makhija, A.C.I.T., Vs. Prop.- M/s Rajesh Kumar & Circle-3, Company, Old Dhan Mandi, Kota. Jaipur. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ABGPM 1361 B vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : None jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Shri R.A. Verma (Addl.CIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 29/11/2017 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@ Date of Pronouncement : 29/11/2017 vkns'k@ ORDER
PER: KUL BHARAT, J.M. Both these appeal filed by the same assessee emanates from the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A)-4, Jaipur dated 21/01/2016 for the A.Y. 2011-12 and 2012-13. In ITA No. 347/JP/2016, the assessee has taken sole ground of appeal, which is against confirming the penalty of Rs. 9,27,000/- U/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act) and in ITA NO. 348/JP/2016 the assessee has also taken sole ground which is against confirming the penalty of Rs. 28,16,930/- made U/s 271AAA of the Act.
ITA 347 & 348/JP/2016_ 2 Bhoj Raj Makhija Vs ACIT 2. At the time of hearing, no one has appeared on behalf of the
assessee. From this, it appears that the assessee is not interested to
pursue his case. So in the circumstances, following the decision of Delhi
Bench of ITAT in the case of CIT Vs. Multiplan India Ltd., and also Estate
of Late Tukojirao Holkar Vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP), the appeals of the
assessee are not admitted and are dismissed as limine as pronounced in
the open court on 29/11/2017.
In the result, the both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 29/11/2017.
Sd/- Sd/- ¼Hkkxpan½ ¼ dqy Hkkjr ½ (BHAGCHAND) (Kul Bharat) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 29th November, 2017 *Ranjan आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Shri Bhoj Raj Makhija, Kota. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The A.C.I.T., Circle-3, Jaipur. 2. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 347 & 348/JP/2016) 6.
vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order, सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत