← Back to search

CHATUR SAMPRADAY AKHADA,NASHIK vs. CIT(E), PUNE

PDF
ITA 2517/PUN/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 April 20254 pages

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ”ए” Ɋायपीठ पुणेमŐ।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
PUNE BENCHES “A” :: PUNE

BEFORE DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.2517/PUN/2024
िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ / Assessment Year: 2024-25
Chatur Sampraday Akhada,
301 4434, Near Ramkund,
Panchvati, Nashik-422003. V s
The Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption),
Pune.
PAN: AABTTC1987H

Appellant/ Assessee

Respondent / Revenue

Assessee by Shri Sanket Joshi – AR
Revenue by Shri Amol Khairnar – CIT-DR
Date of hearing
22/04/2025
Date of pronouncement 24/04/2025

आदेश/ ORDER

PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:

This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax-Exemption, Pune passed under section 12A(1)(ac)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; dated
24.10.2024 for Assessment Year 2024-25. The assessee has raised the following ground of appeal :
“1. The learned CIT(Ex.) erred in rejecting application filed by the appellant in Form 10AB for approval under sub clause (iii) of ITA No.2517/PUN/2024 [A]

2
12A(1)(ac) without appreciating that the said action was not justified on facts and in law.

2.

The learned CIT(Ex.) erred in rejecting the registration u/s 12AB on the ground that the appellant had not complied with the notice of hearing dated 08.10.2024 without appreciating that the appellant had filed online request for adjournment of seven working days on 15.10.2024 whereas the compliance window was closed on 23.10.2024 and therefore, the order passed by the CIT(E) without taking any cognizance of the online adjournment request, was against the principles of natural justice and hence, the same may be declared as null and void in law.

3.

The appellant craves leave to add/alter/ amend any of the grounds of appeal.”

Submission of ld.AR :

2.

The Ld.Authorised Representative of the assessee submitted that Assessee had filed basic details before the ld.CIT(E), then ld.CIT(E) issued further notice. Assessee filed request for adjournment of seven days. However, without waiting for submission of the assessee and without providing any time, ld.CIT(E) passed the order on 24.10.2024. Ld.AR filed copy of the e-Proceeding Acknowledgment dated 15.10.2024 to demonstrate the adjournment request. Ld.AR submitted that assessee may be provided one more opportunity to file the details.

ITA No.2517/PUN/2024 [A]

Submission of ld.DR :

3.

The ld.DR for the Revenue relied on the order of ld.CIT(E).

Findings &Analysis :

4.

We have heard both the parties and perused the records. It is observed that ld.CIT(E) has rejected the Assessee’s application for Registration u/s.12A(1)(ac) of the Act, dated 24.05.2024 only on the ground that Assessee failed to file the details. However, it is also observed that Assessee had requested for a short adjournment of seven days. But, ld.CIT(E) passed the order without granting adjournment.

4.

1 It is observed from the e-Acknowledgment dated 14.08.2024 filed by the Assessee that Assessee had provided Copy of Audit Reports, Copy of Income Tax Returns, Copy of Submission made before Charity Commissioner, Copy of Bank Statement, Written Submission and some other submissions which are appearing as PDF. However, ld.CIT(E) has not considered any of these submissions.

ITA No.2517/PUN/2024 [A]

4
5. In these facts and circumstances of the case, since proper opportunity has not been provided to the assessee and ld.CIT(E) has not considered the submission filed by the Assessee, the order of ld.CIT(E) is set-aside to ld.CIT(E) for denovo adjudication after providing opportunity to the assessee. Accordingly, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.

6.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open Court on 24th April, 2025. (VINAY BHAMORE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 24th April, 2025/ SGR आदेशकᳱᮧितिलिपअᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant. 2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent. 3. The CIT(A), concerned. 4. The Pr. CIT, concerned. 5. िवभागीयᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “ए” बᱶच, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune.

6.

गाडᭅफ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,

////
Senior Private Secretary

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे/ITAT, Pune.

CHATUR SAMPRADAY AKHADA,NASHIK vs CIT(E), PUNE | BharatTax