← Back to search

SHRI GANESH SSK LTD,AHMEDNAGAR vs. D.C.I.T, AHMEDNAGAR, CIRCLE-AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR

PDF
ITA 2509/PUN/2024[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 April 20254 pages

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ”ए” Ɋायपीठ पुणेमŐ।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
PUNE BENCHES “A” :: PUNE

BEFORE DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.2509/PUN/2024
िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ / Assessment Year: 2007-08
Shri Ganesh SSK Ltd.,
A/p. Ranjangaon Khurd, Tal.
Rahata, Dist. Ahmednagar –
413719. Maharashtra.
V s
The DCIT,
Ahmednagar Circle,
Ahmednagar.
PAN: AAEAS0636H

Appellant/ Assessee

Respondent / Revenue

Assessee by Shri Hanmant Dattatray Dhavle – AR
Revenue by Shri Ramnath P Murkunde - DR
Date of hearing
22/04/2025
Date of pronouncement 24/04/2025

आदेश/ ORDER

PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:

This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[NFAC], passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 25.10.2024 for Assessment Year 2007-08. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :

ITA No.2509/PUN/2024 [A]

2
“1. On the fact and in the circumstances of the case and in law of the learned NFAC – Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) Delhi, has erred in disallowing and adding back an amount of Rs.45,76,534/- on account of Excess Cane price paid to members.

2.

The appellant craves for the leave, add, alter, amend, modify and delete any or all the above grounds of appeals before or at the time of the hearing.”

Findings & Analysis :

2.

We have heard both the parties and perused the records. The only issued involved before us is whether price paid for purchase of sugar cane to the members is allowable as deduction or not!

3.

There has been a long-drawn litigation in the case of the assessee on this issue. However, we do not intend to discuss the long-drawn litigation, as after the Amendment to the Income Tax Act, issue is almost settled.

3.

1 “In the Finance Act 2023, the Government has made statutory amendment by inserting sub-section (19) in section 155 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 granting relief to cooperative sugar factories, which is reproduced as follows:

155(19) - Where any deduction in respect of any expenditure incurred for the purchase of sugarcane has been claimed by an assessee, being a co-operative society engaged in the business of manufacture of sugar, and such deduction has been disallowed wholly or partly in any previous year commencing on or before the 1st day of April, 2014, the Assessing Officer shall, on the basis of an application made by such assessee in this regard, recompute the total income of the assessee for such previous year after allowing deduction to the extent such expenditure is incurred at a price which is equal to or less than the ITA No.2509/PUN/2024 [A]

3
price fixed or approved by the Government for that previous year, and the provisions of section 154 shall, so far as may be, apply thereto, and the period of four years specified in sub-section (7) of that section shall be reckoned from the end of previous year commencing on the 1st day of April, 2022.]

3.

2 Further, the SOP for application for Re-computation of total income of co-operative society engaged in the business of manufacture of sugar as provided in the sub-section 19 of Sec. 155 of the LT. Act, 1961 was issued by CBDT on 27/07/2023 vide Circular No.14 Qf2023.”

4.

It is an admitted fact that assessee has filed an application under section 155(19) of the Act as per the procedure laid down after the Amendment. In these facts and circumstances of the case, we set-aside the issue to the Assessing Officer to decide the application of the assessee filed u/s.155(19) of the Act.

5.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open Court on 24th April, 2025. (VINAY BHAMORE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 24th April, 2025/ SGR

ITA No.2509/PUN/2024 [A]

4
आदेशकᳱᮧितिलिपअᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant.
2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent.
3. The CIT(A), concerned.
4. The Pr. CIT, concerned.
5. िवभागीयᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “ए” बᱶच, पुणे / DR,
ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune.

6.

गाडᭅफ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,

////
Senior Private Secretary

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे/ITAT, Pune.

SHRI GANESH SSK LTD,AHMEDNAGAR vs D.C.I.T, AHMEDNAGAR, CIRCLE-AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR | BharatTax