SHAIKH ABID SHAIKH ZAHOOR L/H OF JAHUR KAMRUDDIN BHISTI,JALGAON vs. ITO WARD 1(3), JALGAON
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ”बी” Ɋायपीठ पुणेमŐ।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
PUNE BENCHES “B” :: PUNE
BEFORE DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.620/PUN/2025
िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ / Assessment Year: 2011-12
Shaik Abid Shaikh Zahoor
L/h of Jahur Kamruddin Bhisti,
Shop No.71, Ajintha Road,
New Sabji Mandi, Jalgaon –
425003. Maharashtra.
V s.
The Income Tax Officer,
Ward-1(3), Jalgaon.
PAN: AZUPS6315D
Appellant/ Assessee
Respondent / Revenue
Assessee by Shri Nikhil S Pathak – AR
Revenue by Shri Vinod Pawar – Addl.CIT(DR)
Date of hearing
06/05/2025
Date of pronouncement 07/05/2025
आदेश/ ORDER
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of ld.Commssioner of Income Tax(Appeal)[NFAC] passed under section 250 of the Act, dated 15.01.2025 for the A.Y.2011-12. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :
“1] The learned CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal of the assessee on the ground that there was non-compliance on the part of the assessee to the various notices issued by him and thereby erred in confirming the various additions made by the learned A.Ο.
ITA No.620/PUN/2025 [A]
2
2] The assessee submits that there was a reasonable cause on his part for the non-compliance to the notices issued by the learned CIT(A) and accordingly, request for one more opportunity to present its case before the learned CIT(A).
3] The assessee submits that he had not received the notices issued by the learned CIT(A) and hence, there was non compliance on his part to the notices issued by the learned CIT(A) as request for one more opportunity to present its case before the learned CIT(A).
4] The assessee submits that the addition made of Rs. 14,73,109/- is not justified and the same may kindly be deleted.
5] The assessee submits that the addition made of Rs. 5,13,505/ is not justified on the facts of the case and the same may kindly be deleted.
6] The assessee submits that the addition of Rs. 10,000/- as an unexplained income is not justified and the same may kindly be deleted.
71 The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete any of the above grounds of appeal.”
Submission of ld.AR :
Ld.AR for the Assessee filed a paper book. Ld.AR took us through the paper book, page no.3 and 4 to demonstrate that the notice issued by ld.CIT(A) was sent to the wrong email address. The email address mention in Form No.35 is “jsshah_associates@rediffmail.com”. Ld.AR also submitted that hence, Assessee could not file submission before the ld.CIT(A). Ld.AR requested for one more opportunity. Ld.AR submitted that the Assessee “JAHUR KAMRUDDIN BHISTI” died on “20-10- 2022”. Mrs.JARINA BI JAHUR BHSITI was brought on record as Legal Heir of JAHUR KAMRUDDIN BHISTI. However,
ITA No.620/PUN/2025 [A]
3
Mrs.JARINA BI JAHUR BHISTI died on “26-06-2024”.
Ld.CIT(A) has passed order in the name of the deceased JAHUR
KAMRUDDIN
BHISTI on 15.01.2025, when
Mr.JAHUR
KAMRUDDIN BHISTI was already dead. Thus, ld.CIT(A) passed the order in the name of the deceased person. Ld.AR filed copies of the relevant Death Certificates.
Submission of ld.DR :
Ld.DR for the Revenue relied on the order of Assessing Officer and ld.CIT(A).
Findings & Analysis :
We have heard both the parties and perused the records. In this case, ld.CIT(A) has passed the order dated 15.01.2025 in the name of deceased JAHUR KAMRUDDIN BHISTI. It is also observed that ld.CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee for non-compliance. We have noted from the page number 3 and 4 of the paper book that notices issued by ld.CIT(A) were on incorrect email address.
1 In these facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of the justice we set-aside the order of the ld.CIT(A) to ld.CIT(A) for ITA No.620/PUN/2025 [A]
4
denovo adjudication. We direct the ld.CIT(A) to pass the order in the name Legal Heir of the deceased assessee JAHUR
KAMRUDDIN BHISTI. The Legal Heir of the assessee shall file all the necessary details before the ld.CIT(A). Accordingly, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open Court on 07 May, 2025. (VINAY BHAMORE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 07 May, 2025/ SGR आदेशकᳱᮧितिलिपअᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant. 2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent. 3. The CIT(A), concerned. 4. The Pr. CIT, concerned. 5. िवभागीयᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “बी” बᱶच, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “” Bench, Pune.
गाडᭅफ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,
////
Senior Private Secretary
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे/ITAT, Pune.