DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -28, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. MANOJ KUMAR SINGH, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the approval granted by the JCIT under Section 153D was mechanical and without application of mind, violating the mandatory requirements of the Act. Consequently, the assessment order was vitiated.
What were the facts?
The case involves cross-appeals by the assessee and the revenue concerning the assessment year 2013-14. The primary issue revolves around the approval granted by the JCIT to the draft assessment order under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the approval granted by the JCIT under Section 153D was valid, and if not, whether it vitiates the entire assessment proceedings. Whether additions made by the AO were based on valid evidence and proper procedure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- PCIT v. Shiv Kumar Nayyar597 citing163 Taxmann.com 9 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Sapna Gupta591 citing2022 SCC OnLine ALL 1294 · 2023
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.580 citing454 ITR 312 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.500 citing163 Taxmann.com 118 · 2024 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR
PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM These are cross appeals preferred by the assessee as well as the Revenue against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short] dated 18.08.2025 for Assessment Year 2013-14. Both the appeals are interconnected having common issues. Both the appeals are heard together and disposed off by this common order
Heard and perused the records. The
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153D
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 603/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Sarat Chandra Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 602/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 66/CTK/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 65/CTK/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026