NITIN KHURANA,DELHI vs. ITO, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a procedural defect like belatedly filing Form 67 should not extinguish the substantive right to claim FTC. The delay of 9 days was condoned, and the matter was restored to the AO for verification and allowance of the FTC.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed foreign tax credit (FTC) under section 90/90A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for taxes paid in Canada. However, Form 67 was filed belatedly by 9 days. The CPC disallowed the FTC, and this was upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether belated filing of Form 67 beyond the prescribed due date can lead to disallowance of the substantial right to claim foreign tax credit, despite the delay being curable or condonable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 154,Section 143(1),Section 90,Section 90A,Section 250,Section 139(1),Section 128,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 119,Section 264
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, HON’BLE JUDICIAL & MRS. RENU JAUHRI, HON’BLE
PER RENU JAUHRI :
The above captioned appeal is preferred against the order dated 30.06.2025, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as, “Act”) by Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal), Coimbatore [for short, Ld. CIT(A)].
The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
“1. That the Central Processing Center (CPC) passed the rectification order under section 154 of the Income tax Act,1961 confirming following additions / adjustments made in the tax liability of the appellant while processing the income tax return u/s 143 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
5264_Del_2025_Nitin Khurana Addition Amount (Rs.) Tax liability in Return 0 A
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026