← Back to search

J M CHEMICAL CO.,DELHI vs. ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI

PDF
ITA 787/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 March 20263 pages

Before: YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL

Hearing: 17/03/2026Pronounced: 18/03/2026

PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM: The captioned appeals are filed by the Assessees against the orders of the CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, (‘NFAC’ for short) Delhi dated 09/01/2024 pertaining to the Assessment Years 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15 respectively.

2.

After arguing for sometimes, the Ld. Counsel for aa submitted that the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in Assessee’s own case for A.Y 2015-16 in ITA No. 3595/Del/2024, vide order dated 09/04/2025, remanded the matter to the file of the A.O. with a direction to decide and determine the controversy raised towards issuance of notice under Section 143(2) for assumption of juri iction at the state of issuance of such notice. Thus, sought for allowing the Appeal. 4. We have heard the parties and perused the material available on record. The Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in Assessee’s own case for AY 2015-16 restored the issue to the file of the A.O. in following manners: -

“2. When the matter was called for hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee adverted the additional ground of appeal whereby the Assessee has challenged the assumption of juri iction by the AO by issuing notice under s. 143(2) of the Act without having requisite authority in this regard.

3.

In view of the fact that juri ictional defect in issuance of notice by non-juri ictional AO has been raised, which was not placed before the AO or before the CIT(A), it is in fitness of things to restore the matter back to the file of the AO. The AO shall decide and determine the controversy raised towards issuance of notice under s. 143(2) for assumption of juri iction at the stage of issuance of such notice. The Assessee shall also be at liberty to raise all plea connected to such juri ictional controversy.”

5.

Considering the fact that Assessee has raised the identical additional grounds of appeal in all the above Appeals on the issue of issuance of notice under s. 143(2) of the Act for assumption of juri iction at the stage of issuance of such notice, in order to follow 6. In the result, the Appeals of the Assessee’s are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 18th March, 2026 (MANISH AGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER Date:- 18.03.2026 Reshma Naheed, Sr.P.S

J M CHEMICAL CO.,DELHI vs ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI | BharatTax