PRECIHOLE FOUNDATION,THANE vs. DCIT EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the orders of the CIT(E) and remitted the issue back for denovo adjudication, directing the CIT(E) to afford a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to prove the genuineness of its activities.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed applications for regular registration u/s.12A and approval u/s.80G. The CIT(E) rejected these applications after finding that the assessee failed to provide explanations for discrepancies, despite partial compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) correctly rejected the applications for registration and approval without affording sufficient opportunity to the assessee, and if the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12AB(1)(ac)(iii),Section 80G(5),Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii),Section 80G(5)(iii),Section 12A,Section 80G
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
आदेश / ORDER
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The captioned two appeals at the instance of assessee are against the rejection of applications for regular registration u/s.12AB(1)(ac)(iii) and approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act respectively framed by ld.CIT(E) dated 17.03.2025 and 22.11.2024 respectively.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite due service of notice of hearing. With the assistance of Ld. Departmental Representation, we have perused the record and notice that the assessee filed an applications for registration u/s.12A(1)(ac)(iii)/80G(5)(iii) of the Act by filing Form 10AB on 17.03.-2025 and 22.11.2024 respectively. Thereafter, ld.CIT(E) called for various details mentioned in pages 3 to 7 of the impugned order. Though there was partial compliance but thereafter, ld.CIT(E) rejected the applications for registration u/s.12A of the Act as well as approval u/s.80G(5) stating that the assessee has not furnished any explanation to the discrepancies communicated to it. Therefore, it is presumed that assessee has nothing to say in the matter.
Having heard the ld. Departmental Representative, perusing the record placed before us and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to remit the issue of regular registration u/s.12A of the Act as well as approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act to the file of ld.CIT(E) for denovo adjudication. Needless to say that ld.CIT(E) shall afford reasonable opportunity to the appellant to prove the genuineness of the activities. Assessee can make necessary submissions with regard to the grounds of appeal raised before us. After considering the submissions of the assessee, ld.CIT(E) shall decide the assessee’s applications in accordance with law by passing a speaking order. Assessee is directed to provide latest email id and contact detail to the department for receiving the notices from ITBA portal. Assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and not to take unnecessary adjournment unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. Impugned orders are set aside and the effective grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes.
4. In the result, both the appeals of the appellant are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on this 16th day of May, 2025.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026