JALGAON JILHA MAJUR KAMGAR SAHAKARI SANSTHA FEDERATION LTD.,JALGAON vs. ITO, WARD 1(4), JALGAON, JALGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in treating the claim under Section 80P(2)(d) as a fresh claim, as it was made in the computation of income and audit report. Following judicial precedents, the Tribunal allowed the deduction for interest income derived from investments with other cooperative societies.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P for interest income earned from fixed deposits and advances given to member societies. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, and the CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, treating the claim for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) as a fresh claim not made during assessment proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a cooperative society from investments in other cooperative societies is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, and if a claim made during appellate proceedings for the first time can be considered.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P(2)(a)(vi),Section 80P(2)(d),Section 250,Section 80P(2)(c)(ii),Section 80P
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sant Motiram Maharaj Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. v. ITO135 citing186 ITD 220 · 2020 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC” :: PUNE
Before: DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeal)[NFAC] under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 23.12.2024 for the A.Y.2018-19. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :
ITA No.29/PUN/2025 [A]
“1. The learned CIT(A) erred in holding that the appellant is not eligible to claim the deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Income tax Act, 1961 in respect of Income derived from the activities carried out by t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(vi)
- Shri Samarth Sahakari Majoor Sansth… vs ITO Ward-5, PanvelITA 6343/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed14 May 2026AY 2013-14
- Irula Snake Catchers Industrial Co-Op… vs ITO, Ward-22(1), ChennaiITA 1790/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 Feb 2026AY 2020-21
- Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 and Tps, Kannur vs Kannur Building Materials Co Operative…ITA 600/COCH/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed29 Oct 2025AY 2013-14
- Government Printing Press Employee Credit… vs ITO, Ward 7(1), PuneITA 793/PUN/2025[2019-2020]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2025AY 2019-2020
- Jalgaon Jilha Majur Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha… vs ITO Ward 1(4), JalgaonITA 30/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Aug 2025AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026