GANGADHAR SHRIRAM KATHAR,AURANGABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal observed that the assessee did not receive the notices. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and remanded the case back to the CIT(A) for denovo adjudication, providing an opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) which confirmed an addition based on an assessment order. The assessee contended that they did not receive the notices issued by the CIT(A), thus being unable to reply.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was denied a fair opportunity to present their case due to non-receipt of notices from the CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC” :: PUNE
Before: DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
आदेश/ ORDER
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order ofld.CIT(A)[NFAC] passed under section 250 of the Act, for the A.Y.2012-13, dated 27.02.2025 emanating from Assessment Order u/s.144 r.w.s 147 of the Act, dated 23.08.2019.
Findings & Analysis : 2. We have heard both the parties and perused the records. Ld.AR submitted that Assessee had not received the notices issued by ld.CIT(A). Therefore, Assessee could not reply. On perusal of the ld.CIT(A)’s order, it is observed that ld.CIT(A) has confirmed the addition stating that Assessee failed to file corroborative evidences. Since Assessee had not received notices, in the interest of justice, we set-aside the order of ld.CIT(A) to ld.CIT(A) for denovo adjudication to decide the appeal on merits. The ld.CIT(A) shall provide opportunity to the assessee. Assessee shall file necessary documents before the ld.CIT(A). Accordingly, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open Court on 05 June, 2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026