BHAUSAHEB RAMCHANDRA PAWAR HUF,SANGLI vs. INCOME TAX WARD 5, SANGLI, SANGLI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had successfully filed for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and paid dues. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the assessee to move a miscellaneous application if the scheme application is rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessee sought adjournment to await Form No.4 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, having already submitted Form No.3 and paid taxes. The Revenue representative had no objection to the appeal being dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be adjourned pending receipt of Form No.4 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, or dismissed as withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD
आदेश / ORDER
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to the assessment year 2020-21 is directed against the order dated 12.11.2024 of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi passed u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) arising out of the Assessment Order dated 22.09.2022 passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144B of the Act.
Assessee sought adjournment stating that it has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and has received Form No.2 and tax payment as per Form No.2 has been paid and Form No.3 has also been submitted. However, it sought adjournment till Form No.4 is received. But since the assessee HUF has already submitted Form No.3 and paid due taxes, I do not find any reason to adjourn the appeal and proceed to adjudicate the same on the basis of available records with the assistance of ld. Departmental Representative.
I have gone through the record and notice that assessee HUF has successfully filed the application for settling the tax dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and has also paid the due taxes. Ld. Departmental Representative raised no objection if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed on account of settling of the tax dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. I accordingly dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn subject to rider that in case the assessee HUF’s Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme application is rejected, the assessee will be at liberty to move Miscellaneous Application within the prescribed time limit.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on this 20th day of June, 2025.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026