Loading judgment…
Facts
The assessee applied for registration under Section 12AB of the IT Act. However, due to a typographical error, the application was filed under Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi)(B) instead of the correct Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii). The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application on this ground.
Held
The Tribunal held that the error in filing the application was a curable defect and that the assessee should be given an opportunity to correct it. Relying on previous decisions, the Tribunal set aside the CIT's order.
Key Issues
Whether a typographical error in selecting the wrong sub-clause for filing a Section 12AB registration application is a curable defect and if the CIT should have allowed the assessee to rectify it.
Sections Cited
12AB, 12A(1)(ac)(vi)(B), 12A(1)(ac)(iii), 11
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
Solapur Orthopedic Society, Vs. CIT, Exemption, Pune. 8374/A, Nathwalai, Daffrin Chowk, Railway Lines, Solapur- 413001. PAN : AAHTS6934L Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Miss Kimya Kudva Revenue by : Shri Amit Bobde Date of hearing : 14.07.2025 Date of pronouncement : 29.07.2025 आदेश / ORDER
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 08.04.2025 passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejecting the application for registration u/s 12AB of the IT Act.
Facts of the case, in brief, are, that the assessee has applied for registration in Form 10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi)-ITEM(B) of the IT Act on 04.10.2024. With a view to verify the genuineness of activities of the assessee and compliance to requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust/institution as are 27.11.2024 through ITBA portal requesting the assessee to upload various information detailed in notice. In compliance to the above notice, desired information was furnished by the assessee trust. Subsequently, Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune found that the application was furnished u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi)(B) of the IT Act which is not applicable to the assessee since deduction u/s 11 was claimed by the assessee. After considering the reply, Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejected the application filed by the assessee. It is this order against which the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.
Ld. AR appearing from the side of the assessee submitted that the rejection order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune is unjustified. It was submitted that due to a typographical/inadvertent error the application was filed u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi)(B) whereas the assessee was required to file application u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the IT Act. It was further submitted that application was filed by its own without help of any tax professional and due to this the above mistake occurred. Accordingly, it was prayed before the Bench that mentioning of wrong code in the application is curable defect and Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune, should have had accepted the request of the assessee to treat the application as filed under clause (iii) of 12A(1)(ac) of the IT Act. In support of the above contention, Ld. AR relied on the decision passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Shree Swaminarayan Gadi Trust vs. CIT, [2024] 162 taxmann.com 772 (Surat-Trib.) order dated 13.05.2024 wherein under identical situation Tribunal was pleased to allow the appeal of the assessee. Ld. AR further relied on another decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Raj Krishan Jain Charitable Trust in order dated 05.06.2024, wherein under similar circumstances, the Tribunal was pleased to allow the appeal of the assessee. Accordingly, Ld. AR requested before the Bench to set-aside the order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune and further requested to direct him to consider the application as filed under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the IT Act.
Ld. DR appearing for the Revenue relied on the order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune and requested to confirm the same.
We have heard Ld. Counsels from both the sides and perused the material available on record and also copy of case laws relied on by the assessee. We find that admittedly, the assessee trust was required to file application under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the IT Act but due to inadvertent error the application was filed (vi) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the IT Act and for this reason alone Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejected its application for registration. We find that under identical situations, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Raj Krishan Jain Charitable Trust (supra) allowed the appeal of the assessee by observing as under :- “9. As contended the appellant has committed a technical mistake in making the application under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) instead of clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of the Act. As pointed out the appellant has filed revised form 10AB for seeking registration under the correct provision i.e. Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) which can also be considered.
In consonance with the decision rendered by the co-ordinate Bench, the typographical error deserves to be corrected. Accordingly, the appeal deserves to be allowed and impugned order dated 15.03.2024 of Ld. CIT (E) is liable to be set aside. Hence, the appeal is allowed and we set aside the order of Ld. CIT(E) dated 15-03-2024 and remand the matter back to the file of the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication by considering amended application of the appellant under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act, or he can call for amended application from the appellant.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.”
Respectfully following the above decision passed by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Tribunal (supra) and considering the totality of facts of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it fit to set-aside the order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune and direct him to treat the application already filed by the assessee as under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the IT Act instead of under