SHRI GANESH SSK LTD,AHMEDNAGAR vs. DCIT AHMEDNAGAR CIRCLE , AHMEDNAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored both issues (excess cane price and sale of sugar at concessional rate) back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. For the excess cane price, it directed consideration in light of Section 155(19) of the Income Tax Act. For the sugar sale, it directed the AO to consider specific documents, the State Government's GR, and calculate differences based on levy price instead of market price.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society engaged in manufacturing sugar, filed its return declaring a loss. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions on account of excess sugarcane payment to farmers and sale of sugar at concessional rates. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal regarding the sugar sale but restored the excess cane price issue to the AO.
What were the issues?
Whether additions made by the AO on account of excess cane price paid to farmers and sale of sugar at concessional rates are justified, and whether the AO correctly calculated the difference based on market price.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA
PER R.K. PANDA, VP:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 25.10.2024 of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, relating to assessment year 2011-12. 2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a cooperative society engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of white sugar, compost and its by-product. The assessee society filed its return of income on 27.09.2011 declaring a net loss of Rs.3,33,44,202/- after claiming set-off of unabsorbed loss. The Assessing Officer vide order u/s 143(3) of the Act completed the assessment for the year under consideration by reducing the loss of the company from Rs.3,33,44,202/- to income of Rs.9,66,93,983/- which was then rectified u/s 154 of t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026